See the list of topic categories here.
With what foolish enthusiasm humanity channels life toward the most trivial form of existence: social movements. It is less vain to limit oneself to pure animalistic existence, to mere physical activity.
The act of despoiling an individual of his goods is called robbery, when another individual does the despoiling.
And social justice, when an entire collective entity robs him.
There is no lexicon more propitious to serve ideological purposes than that of “justice.”
In order to acquit or condemn, it is not enough to know if a person is “oppressor” or “oppressed.” What is necessary, in order to judge, is to know what they do and who they are.
Inequality and equality are theses that should be defended alternatively, against the dominant social climate.
In a leveled and egalitarian society, power belongs always and absolutely to the majority, who identify “freedom” with the fulfillment of their wishes.
Seeking solutions to social problems, that is, aiming for a perfect and definitive balance, is an absurd longing, because it presupposes that there is an ultimate order of society. In reality, there are as many possible orders and as many possible societies as there are possible individuals.
“Equality of opportunity” does not mean it is possible for all to be decent, but that all have the right to be indecent.
Society is now ordered against the family, and a greater intensity of social devotion corresponds to a greater disintegration of the family unit.
The leftist screams that freedom is dying when his victims refuse to finance their own murders.